Today is October 27, 2021 -

Rosh Hashanah I 5767

Rosh Hashanah – First Day
(1 Samuel 1:1-2:10)
September 23, 2006

The story of Hannah, the prophet Samuel\’s mother, is linked to Rosh Hashanah in a number a ways. Hannah\’s story is one of a woman, bereft of children, whose sincere prayers to God are answered with the birth of a son. This story parallels the story in the Torah reading of our matriarch, Sarah, who is also childless, is consequently remembered by God and granted a child. In both a these stories, we are taught to recognize that God, indeed remembers those who are in need and does not leave them abandoned. Hannah\’s story however adds an additional element to the picture of Rosh Hashanah by providing us with a model of sincere prayer on a day when heartfelt prayer is the order of the day.

Hannah\’s struggle with prayer was not an easy one. To raise her plight before God, she had to contend not only with her own painful predicament but also with the unresponsive institutions which stood in the way of her pure sincere spirit: \”In her wretchedness… As she kept on praying before the Lord, Eli watched her mouth. Now Hannah was praying in her heart; only her lips moved, but her voice could not be heard. So Eli thought she was drunk. Eli said to her: \’How long will you make a drunken spectacle of yourself? Sober up!\’ And Hannah replied: \’Oh no, my lord! I am a very unhappy woman, I have drunk no wine or any other strong drink, but I have been pouring out my heart to the Lord. Do not take your maidservant for a worthless woman (bat Blial); I have only been speaking all of this time out of my great distress and anguish.\’ \’Then go in peace\’, said Eli, \’and may the Lord God of Israel grant you what you have asked of Him.\’ She answered: \’You are most kind to your handmaid.\’\” (1:10-18)

The Talmud attempts to examine the underlying psychology of this interaction: \”And Eli said to her: \’How long will you make a drunken spectacle of yourself?\’\” – Rabbi Elazar said: \’From this we learn that one who sees something unseemly in his neighbor must reprove him. \”And Hannah said: \’No, my lord.\’\” – Ulla, or some say it was Rabbi Yose ben Hanina: \’She said to him: You are no lord in this matter, nor does the holy spirit rest upon you, that you suspect me of this thing. Some say, She said to him: \’You are no lord, [namely], the Shehina and the holy spirit is not with you that you should rule harshly and not leniently with regard to my behavior. \”I have not drunk wine or hard drink\” – Rabbi Elazar said: \’From here, [we learn] that one is who suspected wrongfully must clear himself.\’ \”Do not take your maidservant to be a worthless woman (bat Blial)\” – this indicates that one who prays while drunk is like one who worships idols, as it is written elsewhere with regard to idolatry: \’Certain sons of Blial have gone forth from among you.\’ (Deut. 13:14) … \”Then Eli said: Go in peace.\” – Rabbi Elazar said: From this we learn that one who suspects his neighbor of a fault which he did not commit must be his forgiveness, moreover, he must bless him, as it says: And the God of Israel should grant your petition.\” (Berachot 31a-31b)

What is clear from the dialogue between Hannah and Eli, as it is found in the Talmudic elaboration, is that their interaction was anything but a conversation. Eli was concerned exclusively with institutional standards (which are quite important) but did not make sufficient effort to discover Hannah\’s concerns. Hannah was concerned with her own bitterness and expressing it to God. She could not imagine that Eli\’s response to her was anything but an expression of his own religious corruption and contempt. The Talmud, in its exaggeration of the confrontation between Hannah and Eli seems to express an awareness that a person\’s relationship with God depends on more than just institutional conformity. It requires a delicate balance between respect for institutional standards and self expression. Hannah\’s prayers are the embodiment of this struggle. (See Y. Brendes, Agadah L\’maaseh. Pp.42- 44)

About This Commentary

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in  Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva.  He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem offers students of all backgrounds the skills for studying Jewish texts. We are a vibrant, open-minded egalitarian community of committed Jews who learn, practise and grow together. Our goal is to provide students the ability and desire to continue Jewish learning and practice throughout their lives. Rashei Yeshiva: Rabbi Joel Levy & Dr. Joshua Kulp. Rabbi Joel Roth, Rosh Yeshiva Emeritus .  Sponsors – The Conservative Yeshiva would like to thank the following for their generous support of the Haftarah Commentary:

  • Underwriters:  Rabbi Michael and Erica Schwab.
  • Special Friends: Rabbi Ron Androphy, Rabbi Jeffrey and Tami Arnowitz, Rabbi Martin Flax, Rabbi Barry Dov Katz, Rabbi Ben Kramer, Rabbi Vernon Kurtz, Rabbi Robert Pilavin, Rabbi Micah Peltz, Rabbi David Rosen.
  • Friends: Aaron Dworin, Rabbi Robert Eisen, Rabbi Jay Goldstein, Rabbi Rafi Kanter, Rabbi Dennis Linson, Rabbi Mark Mallach, Rabbi Marvin Richardson z”l,  Rabbi Joel Roth, Rabbi Ronald Roth, Rabbi Neil Sandler, Rabbi David C. Seed, Mel F. Seidenberg in honor of his grandchildren and two great grandsons,  Rabbi Ari Sunshine.