Today is October 28, 2021 -

Parshat Behar

Haftarah Parshat Behar – outside of Israel
(Jeremiah 32:6-27)
May 28, 2016 / 20 Iyar 5776

It is not easy being a prophet. Jeremiah’s entire career, already from the days of his youth, was that of a prophet of the destruction of the nation, its capital, and the Temple. God had drummed this message into his mind and he had made it known to his people, often resulting in his persecution by the king and his disbelieving brethren. One can only imagine then what his reaction would be when confronted by a prophecy demanding that he redeem a familial plot of land when the nation is on the brink of the destruction: “The word of the Lord came to me, saying: ‘Behold, Hanamel, the son of your uncle Shullam, will come to you and say, Buy my field in Anathoth, for the right of redemption by purchase is yours.’” (32:7)

The contradiction in messages must have been bewildering even to a prophet totally committed to God. Jeremiah even clues the reader in when his predicament is resolved: “And just as the Lord had said, my cousin Hanamel came to me in the prison compound and said to me, ‘Please buy my land in Anathoth, in the territory of Benjamin, for the right of succession is yours, and you have the duty of redemption. Buy it.’ Then I knew that it was indeed the word of the Lord.” (6:8)

Y. Hoffman points out that this passage gives us insight into Jeremiah’s internal struggle, namely, what to make of the conflicting messages. Could this later message possibly be a prophecy? His cousin’s request affirmed that God, indeed, wanted him to purchase the property despite the nation’s pending fate. (See Jeremiah, Mikra L’Yisrael, p. 619) With this affirmation, Jeremiah willingly heeds God’s words.

How do these contradictory prophecies abide together? How could Jeremiah justify his act of faith under these circumstances? Jeremiah confronts God directly with this anomaly. He outlines for God His abilities as a Creator, His redemptive history in Egypt, and His restoration of the people to their land but also reminds Him that the people’s upcoming exile is justified by their behavior. With this said, Jeremiah plaintively asks how a return to the land after exile could ever be justified?

God’s answer says it all: “Behold, I am the Lord, the God of all flesh. Is anything too wondrous for Me?” (6:27) God’s answer to Jeremiah is that He is everything that Jeremiah has attributed Him. Can it be otherwise? Indeed, in the war between despair and hope can it really be otherwise.


About This Commentary

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in  Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva.  He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem offers students of all backgrounds the skills for studying Jewish texts. We are a vibrant, open-minded egalitarian community of committed Jews who learn, practise and grow together. Our goal is to provide students the ability and desire to continue Jewish learning and practice throughout their lives. Rashei Yeshiva: Rabbi Joel Levy & Dr. Joshua Kulp. Rabbi Joel Roth, Rosh Yeshiva Emeritus .  Sponsors – The Conservative Yeshiva would like to thank the following for their generous support of the Haftarah Commentary:

  • Underwriters:  Rabbi Michael and Erica Schwab.
  • Special Friends: Rabbi Ron Androphy, Rabbi Jeffrey and Tami Arnowitz, Rabbi Martin Flax, Rabbi Barry Dov Katz, Rabbi Ben Kramer, Rabbi Vernon Kurtz, Rabbi Robert Pilavin, Rabbi Micah Peltz, Rabbi David Rosen.
  • Friends: Aaron Dworin, Rabbi Robert Eisen, Rabbi Jay Goldstein, Rabbi Rafi Kanter, Rabbi Dennis Linson, Rabbi Mark Mallach, Rabbi Marvin Richardson z”l,  Rabbi Joel Roth, Rabbi Ronald Roth, Rabbi Neil Sandler, Rabbi David C. Seed, Mel F. Seidenberg in honor of his grandchildren and two great grandsons,  Rabbi Ari Sunshine.