Today is November 24, 2017 -

Haftarah Parshat Vayehi

Haftarah Parshat Vayehi (1 Kings 2:2-12)
December 26, 2015 / 14 Tevet 5776

The transfer of power in a hereditary monarchy was a critical event at the beginning of the Davidic house. David sought to ensure that his son Solomon would properly fulfill his role, offering him these words of blessing: “I am going the way of all the earth; be strong and be a man (v’hayita l’ish).” (2:2)

The intention of the blessing “be a man” is difficult to ascertain, but it does offer us a window into what commentators discern to be requisite personality traits for a king. Targum Yonathon, the Jewish Aramaic translation of the Prophets, renders it as “a man who fears sin”. He probably presumed that since leaders have few limits on their behavior, it is necessary for them to be able to police their own behavior. Rabbi David Kimche, (12th century Provence) expands on this idea: “zealous and in control of yourself, and in control of your impulses (yitzrot).” Both of these commentators stress the need for self- control.

Rabbi Levi ben Gershon (Ralbag – 13th century France) asserts that the word “ish” connotes maturity: “that your deeds should not be those of one who is young in years nor adolescent, but rather they should be the deeds of an important person – but still they should be done with considered consultation.” The concern here is that Solomon should act as a strong responsible adult. Ralbag, however, is also knows that strong leaders often act capriciously. This explains why he wants to temper the strong leader’s power with the advice of others.

These commentators are profoundly aware that power can easily be corrupted. The leader must be strong, but must also have a built-in sense of self-control. He or she must have a strong sense of right and wrong as well as the ability to curb the appetites which power might induce. There is also a strong awareness that a leader who conducts him or herself without consultation is likely to do harm since they might lack adequate perspective to make the right decision.

Ultimately, it seems that David probably wanted to give his son Solomon the benefit of his life experiences. The commentators on this passage spelled out what that might mean with the added perspective of generations of history under their belts.

 

About This Commentary

This study piece is offered as a service of the United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva. It is prepared by Rabbi Mordechai (Mitchell) Silverstein, senior lecturer in  Talmud and Midrash at the Conservative Yeshiva.  He is a graduate of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

The United Synagogue Conservative Yeshiva in Jerusalem offers students of all backgrounds the skills for studying Jewish texts. We are a vibrant, open-minded egalitarian community of committed Jews who learn, practise and grow together. Our goal is to provide students the ability and desire to continue Jewish learning and practice throughout their lives.
Rashei Yeshiva: Rabbi Joel Levy & Dr. Joshua Kulp.
Rabbi Joel Roth, Rosh Yeshiva Emeritus . 

Sponsors – The Conservative Yeshiva would like to thank the following for their generous support of the Haftarah Commentary:

  • Underwriters:  Rabbi Michael and Erica Schwab.
  • Special Friends: Rabbi Ron Androphy, Rabbi Jeffrey and Tami Arnowitz, Rabbi Martin Flax, Rabbi Barry Dov Katz, Rabbi Ben Kramer, Rabbi Vernon Kurtz, Rabbi Robert Pilavin, Rabbi Micah Peltz, Rabbi David Rosen.
  • Friends: Aaron Dworin, Rabbi Robert Eisen, Rabbi Jay Goldstein, Rabbi Rafi Kanter, Rabbi Dennis Linson, Rabbi Mark Mallach, Rabbi Marvin Richardson z”l,  Rabbi Joel Roth, Rabbi Ronald Roth, Rabbi Neil Sandler, Rabbi David C. Seed, Mel F. Seidenberg in honor of his grandchildren and two great grandsons,  Rabbi Ari Sunshine.